Subscribe to our blog

Your email:

Web Design & Internet Marketing Blog

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Web Design: Stock Photography Monopoly

 | Submit to Digg digg it | Submit to Reddit reddit | Add to delicious delicious | Submit to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon | Share on Twitter Twitter | Share on LinkedIn LinkedIn 

"A photo is worth a thousand words." 

My original intention was to write a blog post on photography options for your web site, but during my research I came to a surprising conclusion - high end stock photography has been monopolized by a single company, Getty Images.

To backtrack a little, I usually recommend that my clients start their image search at the less expensive stock photography websites, such as iStockPhoto, BigStockPhoto and StockXpert.

iStockPhoto is my favorite, but all 3 have a huge selection of photos for very reasonable prices - just a couple of bucks per photo.  They are all credit-based operations, where you purchase photo credits and then use your credits to download images.  Web-quality photos are only 1-3 credits apiece depending upon the image size, and print-quality photos run 6-18 credits each.  Image size and DPI (dots per inch) determine the price.

Occasionally you may not be able to find exactly what you are looking for on these lower-priced websites.  If you have a very specific image in mind, you have several other options to choose from:

  1. Take the photo yourself
  2. Hire a professional photographer
  3. Look at some of the higher priced stock photography websites

The Monopoly

Here is where my article started to fall apart.  I don't often use these high-end stock photography websites, so it has been a while since I have visited them.  As I started to poke around on the Internet to see which ones are still out there, I kept getting re-directed to the same website over and over again - Juniper Images.

Getty is the parent company of Juniper Images.  Their prices for web quality photos start at $50 apiece unless you purchase a photo CD (prices range from $150 - $850) or a photo subscription (big bucks!)  If you are on a tight budget, the pricing may be difficult to swallow, but it is well worth it if you find just the right image - the one you've been searching for.

From what I can see Juniper has gobbled up over 100 of their former competitors and created "Photo Collections" using their competitor's brand names.  So instead of going to multiple websites looking for your photos, you can just go to Juniper Images and search for your photos in one place.  Usually a monopoly is not a good thing, but as long as the prices don't get out of hand I guess getting your photos in once place actually makes life a little easier. 

Do you have any favorite stock photography websites that are still independent and not listed above?  Please share in the comments below.

Comments

Good to see you weighing in on photography! I'm still snapping away, but mainly for fun and my large client in Phoenix. The problem with a lot of stock photographs is that they look just like stock. My niece in Wisconsin got married last year in a very small church that had a website. All the photos of people looked like they were Chicago models and the religious photos looked worse. So it's important for web designers and owners to have a much better sense of how people see things.
Posted @ Wednesday, August 05, 2009 9:08 PM by Ron Goodenow
Hi Ron, 
 
Good to hear from you! You definitely have a point, but many of my customers feel that they can't afford to pay a professional photographer and so they turn to stock photography. 
 
Thanks for the comment!
Posted @ Thursday, August 06, 2009 6:21 AM by Liz Gallagher
Hi Liz: I wasn't necessarily plugging pros, but more careful selection of photos. Actually, today's digital cameras can be used by good effect by almost anyone, and from there it is generally editing that can make for a good and usuable photo. A web designer can learn Photoshop Elements. In any case, some pros or semi-pros aren't really an arm and a leg..., particularly if site or road time is kept to a minimum. At the end of the day it depends on the kind of organization or company and, yup, we're all pinching pennies til they scream!
Posted @ Thursday, August 06, 2009 8:16 AM by Ron Goodenow
Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics

Receive email when someone replies.